Breastfeeding Discrimination takes a Blow (Thank You, Dr. Sophie Currier)

Breastfeeding symbol

The Supreme Court of Massachusetts made a pretty groundbreaking decision last week. In their own words:

“The condition of lactation is inextricably linked to pregnancy and thus sex linked. The fact that a women is no longer pregnant when she is nursing or pumping matters not as lactation is a natural incident of pregnancy.”  That means…

Massachusetts now recognizes that breastfeeding discrimination is gender discrimination.

You and I have known forever that pregnancy and breastfeeding are linked to sex and gender, but U.S. Civil Rights Law has barely woken up to this fact. I wrote about this in Why Breastfeeding Discrimination is Legal–the most meaningful way that women can be protected from breastfeeding discrimination is if courts recognize that it’s part of gender discrimination–but judges seem to have a really hard time with that because they view breastfeeding as a “choice” and not as something tied to being a woman. As the Massachusetts Supreme Court put it:

“Indeed, even in the context of the pregnancy discrimination act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (2006), one Federal court has noted that ‘no judicial body thus far has been willing to take the expansive interpretative leap to include rules concerning breast-feeding within the scope of sex discrimination.’ Derungs v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 374 F.3d 428, 439 (6th Cir.2004).”

 

But the Massachusetts Supreme Court goes there, “Our decision in the context of the equal rights act and public accommodation statute counts, that lactation is a sex-linked classification, recognizes that there remain barriers that prevent new mothers from being able to breastfeed or express breast milk.

Thank you. I know it’s obvious to most of us, but thank you, Supreme Court of Massachusetts for recognizing it!

It’s a big deal that the Massachusetts Supreme Court has unanimously recognized that breastfeeding discrimination is gender discrimination. This extends a new level of protection from discrimination to breastfeeding mothers in Massachusetts and it will have a positive impact in other states too.

The Supreme Court of Massachusetts came to this new point of view in the context of the case Sophie Currier v. National Board of Medical Examiners. The basic facts of Dr. Currier’s case:

“In 2007, when Dr. Sophie Currier’s daughter, Lea, was four months old and still exclusively breast-fed, Sophie requested extra break time during an all-day medical licensing exam to pump her breasts. The test’s overseers, the National Board of Medical Examiners, said no, that breastfeeding was not federally recognized as a legal disability and therefore could not be accommodated.”–from Behind Breastfeeding Victory: ‘Motherhood And Career Collided’ by Carey Goldberg (WBUR, 4/20/12)

Dr. Currier sued to get pumping break time, and she won break time for her exam in an excellent 2007 opinion by Judge Katzmann, but that didn’t do much good for other breastfeeding medical students or mothers in general, because the 2007 opinion only applied to Dr. Currier and the NBME refused to change its policy for other test-takers.

So Dr. Currier continued the legal fight after her exam and took the issue to the Supreme Court of Massachusetts–she did this to change the law for other women’s benefit with no possible gain for herself. 

And for that, I have to say:

Thank you, Dr. Sophie Currier

(and thank you, Dr. Currier’s Lawyers!)
I’m realizing that Dr. Currier deserves her own Thank You post. She’s getting one from me shortly…

 

Are you feeling hopeful too?

Test Accomodations for Breastfeeding Test-Takers – Request Denied?

Final post in this series (for now). If you haven’t seen them already, be sure to check out my two previous posts about my experience pumping during the bar exam and applying for pumping breaks.

So, you’ve applied for pumping breaks during the bar exam or LSAT or other major, life-changing exam and your request is denied.  Where do you go from here?

Appeal! 

There is no real risk or cost to appealing a decision about testing accommodations, but you may want to consider consulting with a lawyer at this point. Also, an appeal can take time, which is why you want to apply for accommodations as early as possible.

File a lawsuit and request a preliminary injunction to get pumping breaks. 

This is what Sophie Currier did to get time to pump during Step 2 CK of her medical boards–after her applications for accommodations and appeal were denied. It worked, and her decision to sue resulted in pumping breaks for her and this marvelous opinion by Judge Katzmann–every person who cares about breastfeeding rights should read it. 

In Sophie’s case, she was able to argue for pumping breaks under Massachusetts’ Equal Rights Amendment and Public Accommodation statutes, which provide broader protection against discrimination than the federal law. 

Unfortunately this option can cost thousands of dollars unless you can find a lawyer (or law clinic or public interest law organization) to represent you “pro bono.” Depending on the law in your state, there is no guarantee that you’ll win your lawsuit.

Go Public. 

One of the big arguments that the LSAT and National Board of Medical Examiners make when they deny pumping time is that this is only one complainer making a lot of noise–nobody *really* needs time to pump. Even without a lawsuit you can air your grievances and draw attention to the problem.

Suffer through it, but minimize the discomfort and health risk. 

This is what breastfeeding lawyers and doctors-to-be have done in years past–you get so used to toughing it out, that you try to be tough even when it’s not a great idea.

Doing this involves practicing speed pumping in preparation for test day, pumping immediately before the exam begins whether you “need” to or not, finding a place you can pump during break, and taking a lot of tylenol and advil. Not fun or recommended, but if you’re determined to take the test even without the breaks and you want to keep breastfeeding, this is your best shot.

Wait to take the test until you’re not breastfeeding as frequently

This isn’t an option for everyone. In fact, I feel silly even bringing it up. The exams to enter law school, begin medical residency, become an attorney, etc, happen on a certain calendar. If you miss the window you can miss your opportunity to apply for programs or jobs  for a year. A lot of people will tell you to just take the test later–but you know whether that’s actually financially and professionally possible for you.

A note on publicity: Sophie Currier was publicly ridiculed for suing for pumping breaks–or ignored, even by women who should have been championing her causeI’m grateful she went first and I hope her experience won’t scare others from following that path.

I feel like I may be missing some options for nursing test-takers. Do you have any other ideas or tips?

Can I Pump Breast Milk During the Bar Exam? – Test Accommodations

Check out Part 1, my experience as a breastfeeding mom taking the NY bar exam.

Yesterday another person found my blog searching for “nursing mothers and test accommodations bar exam“–so it’s time for a follow-up post with useful information for women taking exams like the bar exam, LSAT, USMLE (medical boards), etc., while breastfeeding.

Caveat: I’m not an expert in this area of law. I’m just someone with a bit of personal experience trying to pump during a major exam. However, I have done some legal research and talked to people who are smarter than me about these issues.

Entrance exams can and do discriminate against breastfeeding mothers by denying them time to pump.

This happens because of the big gaping hole in federal legislation that I wrote about in “Why Breastfeeding Discrimination is Legal” – breastfeeding isn’t covered as part of gender or pregnancy in the Civil Rights Act, it isn’t covered as a short-term disability under the American Disabilities Act, and the Fair Labor Standard Act pumping provisions only apply at work for certain employers and employees (see my post and BreastfeedingLaw.com).

So here is a bit of practical advice for nursing women taking major standardized exams–

Apply for testing accommodations at the same time as you apply for the exam.

Every major American exam has an application for testing accommodations for test-takers with disabilities. This is required by the American Disabilities Act. Breastfeeding is NOT protected as a disability under the ADA, but for your best shot at break time, you have to go through the same process as a student seeking accommodations for a disability.

The applications for test accommodations are not new-mom-friendly.

  • They are long.
  • They require supporting documentation from your doctor(s).
  • They have early deadlines (typically 2-3 months before the exam, and you want ample time to appeal if you’re initially denied).

So if you’re reading this while pregnant and planning to take the bar exam (or USMLE or LSAT) with an infant like I did, get your OB to write you a letter now and apply for pumping breaks before baby is born–I swear it would be easier to do while pregnant than it is with an infant.

Figure out what kind of testing accommodations you’ll need.

You may not have a baby yet. You may not know how much your child will be nursing or if you’ll even succeed at nursing at the time you should be applying for accommodations. That was part of the uncertainty that led me not to apply for accommodations at all.

In hindsight this is what I’d ask for (and what I think you should ask for):

  • 30 minutes to pump for every 3 hours of test time,
  • a private place to pump that isn’t a bathroom,
  • permission to bring your pump into the testing area (or somewhere accessible) so that you can get it and get pumping immediately when you need to.

Your doctor will need to support these requests in the application. Even if you don’t need additional time to pump it’s wise to have permission to bring your pump and place to use it before the exam and after (and that’s an accommodation that is much easier to get).

You might be granted pumping breaks–but test administrators can argue that they shouldn’t have to give them to you.

I’ve heard from solid sources that the the following professional exams have given lactating women additional break time to pump without a problem:

  • California Board of Psychology Licensing Exam
  • American Board of Family Medicine Certification Exam
  • American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology Certification Exam
  • Certain State Bar Exams

 They don’t advertise it, but women who ask are getting pumping breaks. It’s clear that some serious professional organizations don’t view pumping breaks as a threat to the integrity of their licensing exams.

But there are others:

The LSAT, as a rule, does not accommodate nursing mothers. The exam is five 35-minute blocks and one 15 minute break. That sounds like a short test, but the intro and security–they fingerprint everyone–are very time consuming. My LSAT experience lasted more than 6 hours in the testing room–not humane without  a pumping break.

Then there’s the National Board of Medical Examiners and the famous case of Sophie Currier. The National Board of Medical Examiners has fought giving breastfeeding doctors additional break time during Step 2 of the USMLE (a 9 hour test with 45 minutes of break time) all the way to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts–in the next few months there will be a big decision about whether and how Massachusetts protects breastfeeding mothers from discrimination. Until then, the NBME maintains that no other nursing mothers will receive pumping breaks–unless they sue for it.

My view is that it’s worth applying–the more women ask, the more likely it is that things will change. Your application may be the tipping point.

Have any of you been through something like this? How do you feel about pumping breaks for test-taking moms?

Tomorrow’s post will be about what your options are if you’re denied additional breaks to pump.

Feel free to email me about this if you have questions about your situation–I’m not taking cases but I can offer some friendly support and point you to resources.

Why Breastfeeding Discrimination is Legal

English: A statue of Justice on the tympanum o...

Last week federal judge in Texas ruled that a mother is not protected by law from losing her job if she is fired for asking to pump breast milk at work for her baby. The Judge’s stated reason for this decision can be boiled down to this: breastfeeding is not “pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition” and civil rights law only protects “pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition.”

When I read the case, the mom in me said, “WHAT? How is lactation NOT related to pregnancy and childbirth?!” The lawyer in me was not surprised.

Here’s why: Unless the Civil Rights Act explicitly says otherwise, civil rights/equal protection law says we only protect people from being discriminated against for things they have absolutely no choice about.

For example, before the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 was passed and made pregnancy discrimination illegal, the law according to the Supreme Court was this (paraphrasing):

Discrimination against a pregnant woman is acceptable and is not gender discrimination in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964–because even though only women get pregnant, not all women are pregnant. (Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 US 484 (1974)).

There’s also a cute bit in that case about how it’s entirely fair to not provide women employees with insurance coverage for pregnancy and childbirth because men don’t get coverage for pregnancy and childbirth either. I know. It’s nuts.

It took a new act from Congress, the above-mentioned Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, to impose some biology and common sense on the federal courts and everyone else.

And even though the Pregnancy Discrimination Act overruled the Supreme Court’s Geduldig decision–the logic (or illogic) behind it still stands: because breastfeeding is a choice and not a medically “necessary” element of pregnancy or childbirth, most judges are not going to think it’s protected from discrimination.

Yes, this is ridiculous. The only thing I can think of that will change this is to re-write the law to explicitly protect breastfeeding moms. Which is what Oregon’s Senator Jeff Merkley and House Representative Carolyn B. Maloney are trying to do with The Breastfeeding Promotion Act of 2011 (thanks Hygeia Baby Blog  for pointing me there!)

I think we should get that law passed–who’s with me?

 

Working and Pumping Series – Breastfeeding and the Law (Part 1 of 5)

Mother breastfeeding a baby in the presence of...

Don’t forget to check out Part 2 (Negotiating for Pump Breaks) and Part 3 (Supplementing with Formula) of this series!

Last night as I was putting the finishing touches to my post on pumping at work and the law, Kellymom.com tweeted a link to a fantastic new website on Breastfeeding Law by Jake Aryeh Marcus. Ms. Marcus is a lawyer and activist who has put together a very comprehensive resource of all breastfeeding and pumping laws in the United States including their enforcement provisions.* Upon reading her website and this excellent article in particular, I decided the best thing to do would be to scrap 95% of what I’d written and point anyone wondering about breastfeeding and pumping laws to Breastfeeding Law.

*Enforcement provisions are what give a law teeth–the monetary fine or jail time or other punishment that a lawbreaker risks if he violates the law or an injunction that forces the offending party to stop breaking the law RIGHT NOW (and not in 4 years when a trial finally happens). The point is to deter people from breaking the law and/or reduce the damage of their lawbreaking.  Ms. Marcus demonstrates that not a lot of breastfeeding and pumping laws have teeth. That’s a problem.

A law without an enforcement provision can still be used in a civil lawsuit to help make a case. But that’s not good enough. Civil lawsuits (what I do all day) are more of a long-range effort to get people and companies to pay for past wrongs and modify their behavior going forward. Civil lawsuits can be an excellent solution in many situations, but if you want your work to let you pump so you can have a successful breastfeeding relationship with your baby while he’s still a baby, a civil lawsuit is probably not what will help you this week or even this year.

It’s important to know your rights, and also your ability–or lack thereof–to legally enforce those rights. And we should keep clamoring to get some teeth put into these laws.

But how much does all this legal stuff matter if you want to pump at work?

I’m not sure. I think that even toothless laws probably have some beneficial effect on the status quo–encouraging employers toward supporting breastfeeding and pumping  moms. How many women want to introduce the idea of pumping breaks by telling the boss, “If you don’t let me do it, I can sue you!” Most (all?) breastfeeding moms who want to pump at work would probably rather not resort to the law at all–they just want to give their babies breastmilk.  My bet is–and my unscientific anecdotal evidence seems to support it–that old fashioned negotiation skills will get your pumping at work needs met 97% of the time. I want better laws to support the last 3% of pumping moms. Negotiating with your employer about pumping at work is the subject of tomorrow’s post…

What do you think? Are toothless breastfeeding laws useless? Do they help a little or hurt?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: